Democrats hate America.
Despite America’s appetite for aggressive efforts to attack al Queda, Democrats have done nothing but stand in the way and demand additional rights and safeguards for terrorist detainees. U.S. Senate Democrats have decided that their constituencies -- aging 1960s liberals, university professors, international celebrities – are in line with the terrorists. Despite cries from across the country to get tough on terrorism, Democrats have sided with the terrorists’ interests.
Every time the terrorists attack American soldiers or innocent Iraq citizens in Iraq, you can count upon the Democrats to argue to “pull out” of Iraq (didn’t the Democrats learn anything in their sex-ed class: premature pull outs are not effective strategies!) Certainly the Democrats, especially the professoriate class, are able to understand that there must be some inherent reason that the terrorists have headed to Iraq. Would reason could that be? Surely the terrorists did not enter Iraq with the intent of creating a peaceful country that will be allies with the world community.
Even if the Democrats do not support the war against Saddam Hussein, perhaps because they believe that Mr. Hussein was an honorable statesman in the mold of George Washington, they should not continue to disparage the war effort. For one thing, the terrorists continue to attack the troops, not because they intend to win on the battlefield, but rather because they hope that this will cause the Democrats to speak more loudly against the war, hoping for a withdrawal. This is not in the national interests of the United States. If we did withdraw prematurely, the terrorists would not only take over Iraq and establish a terrorist state, but terrorists would continue to strike against America’s interests in the hopes that wimp Democrats would support a withdrawal. Democrats who continue to speak out against the war, hoping for a withdrawal, obviously hate America and have sided with our terrorist enemies.
Democrats have to realize that they are weak on national security and should focus on their strengths—whatever that may be. National polls taken over the last few decades have shown that the public has consistently given Democrats poor marks for their stance on national security issues. It is therefore quite surprising that Democrats have chosen to continue to focus on this issue. In life, one must narrow one’s focus towards those things that they are able to accomplish. Democrats have never won a national election based upon their stanches on national security. Isn’t it time that the Democrats withdraw from this particular issue?
The constituency within the Democratic Party that cares about national security positively scares the public. When the public at large sees protests from Democratic activists groups—such as A.N.S.W.E.R. (an international, extreme, left-wing anti-war group that has never condemned a dictatorship in its entire existence)—the public becomes fearful. The public rightly things that such individuals would not be proper representatives of the public at large. Even more unfortunate is that the Democrats have to be accountable to these irresponsible individuals. The main reason that formerly “mainstream” Democrats have to listen to these malcontents is because the malcontents, lead by party chairman Howard Dean, actually represent the base of the party. And the base of the Democratic Party clearly hates America, resents our standard of living, and wishes to send the United States back to a period of time where we were a third-world nation. Unfortunate, but true. Therefore, the public can only protect America by opposing the Democratic Party, which clearly hates America.