UCLA law professor Jonathan Zasloff opposes free speech

In a recent online article on FoxNews.com, it exposes the collusion between liberal reporters in their attempt to spread propaganda to millions of Americans.  One rather remarkable post on one of these litservs was a question by radical UCLA law professor Jonathan Zasloff, in which he asked, “I hate to open this can of worms, but is there any reason why the FCC couldn't simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires?"   It is obvious that a man like Mr. Zasloff does not believe in free speech or the limitations placed on the government by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.  (Further, as the Founders ponted out, since Congress has not been granted the power to censor television stations, it simply cannot do this—even if the First Amendment had not been created.  I decided to write to this “professor.”  Here is the text of my written comments:

Mr. Zasloff,
I read on the internet that you wrote that the government should be able to shut down Fox.  You have a lot of degrees, but apparently you have never heard of the First Amendment.  Perhaps you believe that the only viewpoint that is worthy of free speech is the socialist-collectivist-altruist one.  As an alumni of UCLA, I am embarrassed that a "professor" would not understand how the First Amendment operates. 

UCLA law professor Jonathan Zasloff opposes free speech

In a recent online article on FoxNews.com, it exposes the collusion between liberal reporters in their attempt to spread propaganda to millions of Americans.  One rather remarkable post on one of these litservs was a question by radical UCLA law professor Jonathan Zasloff, in which he asked, “"I hate to open this can of worms, but is there any reason why the FCC couldn't simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires?"   It is obvious that a man like Mr. Zasloff does not believe in free speech or the limitations placed on the government by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.  (Further, as the Founders ponted out, since Congress has not been granted the power to censor television stations, it simply cannot do this—even if the First Amendment had not been created.  I decided to write to this “professor.”  Here is the text of my written comments:

Mr. Zasloff,
I read on the internet that you wrote that the government should be able to shut down Fox.  You have a lot of degrees, but apparently you have never heard of the First Amendment.  Perhaps you believe that the only viewpoint that is worthy of free speech is the socialist-collectivist-altruist one.  As an alumni of UCLA, I am embarrassed that a "professor" would not understand how the First Amendment operates. 

US Senator Barbara Boxer wants to raise electricity prices dramatically. Let her run on this platform if that is her passion.

Democrat US Senator Barbara Boxer has spent the last several years championing the policy of dramatically raising our electricity prices.  Considering that this is one of her passions, why doesn’t she run on this policy?  She should say, quite clearly, in a television ad, that it is her goal to cause electricity prices to “skyrocket.”  Let’s see how many votes she will get then.

Donald Berwick, a Marxist, will now control your health care decisions.

President Obama nominated Donald Berwick to run Medicare and Medicaid.  The US Senate did not schedule any hearings on this man.  Since the US Senate will be in recess, Obama will be making a recess appointment of this man.   Donald Berwick is the absolute worst person to be in charge of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).  This is a man who believes that the government should be in control of health care and must ration care.  He praised the NHS health care system in the UK, which rations care.  He condemns capitalism and the American system of providing health care.  Instead, he praises, and indeed says that he “romanticizes” the fact that the UK system rations health care through the iron fist of its bureaucracies.  He is an idiot.  He is not an intellectual.  He is not compassionate.    He is a man without any merit who believes that his decisions should override those of millions of individuals arranging their health care decisions themselves. 

Nancy Pelosi believes paying non-workers increases net employment. Seriously!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said today that taking money from individuals who are working and redistributing it to pay those who are not employed will somehow create more jobs.  She really said this!   Is she working for the Onion?  How does this work in practice?  A logical person would say that this would make the productive worker poorer (and sacrifice his liberty) while the non-worker will receive an unearned benefit precisely because he does not work.  Hence, the worker who creates wealth gets punished, while the non-worker gets rewarded.  Hmm, could this be a pattern with the Democrat Party?  Could it be that they want to only provide support to those who are parasites?

North Korea thinks that they are Obama.

North Korea says that they are owed $75 trillion from US citizens.  Who do they think they are?  Obama?

Paul McCartney is a jerk.

Paul McCartney is an immature, uncurious, and aggressive statist.  Yes, he was in the Beatles.  We all liked his music.   Does that mean that we should consider his uninformed opinion on the environment more than anyone else?  No.  What is his expertise on global warming/climate change?  Absolutely nothing.  However, what is quite clear is that he, like most statists, likes the idea of controlling the people.  Just as he was able to get girls to swoon to his music, he would like to get a continent to shrug as a result of his overbearing socialist policies. 

Obama’s unconstitutional ‘taking’ of BP’s shareholder’s property

What I really find upsetting about the BP oil spill situation is that Obama has acted in an unconstitutional manner.  Obama does not have any Constitutional authority to steal $20 billion from BP’s shareholders and redistribute it to politically connected recipients.  What do I support?  I believe that legitimate claims should either be voluntarily provided by BP or through civil lawsuits in state or federal courts.  When there is a legitimate grievance, individuals should have their day in court, with an impartial judge and possibly a jury (if they request one), using objective law and facts to prove that they are owed money.  In America, we do not assign presidents dictatorial powers to act as a judge and jury.  That’s not America. 

Lame duck Congress is frightening

Guess what is frightening?  A lame duck session in Congress where the Democrats will raise taxes, impose cap and trade, a VAT tax, and legalize the illegal aliens.  Democrats have contempt for the American people, so it is not unreasonable to imagine Democrats trying this.

Obama has shown contempt for the American people. 57% oppose his performance.

Obama has shown nothing but contempt for the American people since he has been elected President of the United States of America.  Well, this arrogance has certainly had an impact in undermining his poll numbers.  57% of the American people oppose Obama’s performance as President.

Time to fire US Senator (“ma’am”) Barbara Boxer

When I casually did an informal, unscientific search of the California US Senate race, it is quite apparent that all of the energy is on the Republican side.  Very few Democrats are taking the time to show their support for the intellectually deficient, morally bankrupt, and emotionally unstable US Senator Barbara Boxer.  I suppose it is hard for Democrats to get very excited and in favor of a woman who supports destruction of the energy industry, health care rationing, and ever higher taxes.  It is time for California to vote to fire Barbara Boxer.  She has stayed long enough in the US Senate. 

Vote for Chuck DeVore for US Senate from California

If you’re like me, you are probably tired of Republicans who know how to talk about conservative policy positions and then move leftward after they win a primary.  However, there is one statesman running for the US Senate from California.  The name of this man?  Chuck DeVore.  Chuck DeVore knows that the government’s job is to protect individuals’ pre-existing individual rights.  He has opposed the bailouts, opposed the phony “stimulus,” supports dramatic reductions in taxes and government spending, and would vote “no” on Obama’s radical judicial nominees.  Vote for Chuck DeVore. 

Zev Chafets' book on Rush Limbaugh

I just read an excerpt of Zev Chafets' book on Rush Limbaugh, and it is great.  Read it here.

Obama doesn't care about the troops.

Why is President Obama not going to Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day? It is simple: Obama does not care about showing signs of patriotism to this nation.  He does not respect liberty, and he certainly has no interest in celebrating anything that happened prior to him being elected.  So it makes sense that a man like him, who has no class, and who does not care about the office of the presidency, would not even show our soldiers and veterans that he cares.  Why should he?  He doesn't care.

Obama's ideas aren't new, but they sound like socialism

I'm always shocked by the wealth of information that one can find on the internet.  While browsing through Google's Book search feature, I found an old pamplet published in 1848 about communism and socialism.  The fact that it describes Barack Obama proves that a) his philosophy is not new and b) his philosophy is indeed socialistic in its orientation.