Ban Muslim Immigrants Now.

Diversity is not a strength!  How can it be that "diversity is our strength" when the evidence suggests otherwise?  Where is the evidence that admitting backward, third world losers actually helps our economy.  Banning Islam, Islamists, the Koran, and illiterate immigrants would benefit our country!

Donald Trump Failed the California Primary

It's funny how people claim that Donald Trump did spectacularly well in California. Actually, he did very poorly. Donald Trump received 787,408 votes in the California Republican primary, which was 77.4% of the vote. Let's compare this to other Republicans from the past: In 2000, George W. Bush was the Republican primary winner with 1,725,162 votes! In 2004, George W. Bush ran unopposed and got 2,216,047! He increased his share of the vote even when he was not running against anyone! In 2008, John McCain got 1,238,988 votes. In 2012, Mitt Romney received 1,328415 votes. Thus, Donald Trump's performance is the worst Republican winner of the California Primary in 16 years. Lots of Republicans are not voting for Mr. Trump. It's obvious. Not all of us have gone to Trump University.

"The Big Short' is an Indictment of Our Financial System

A lot of people incorrectly believe that the financial system is stable.  The biggest problem is that people interpret the status quo as stable when in fact there are many problems that underly our contemporary economy.  The wonderful book "The Big Short," shows that people who think critically may have a good chance of understanding inherent weaknesses that exist in our economy, and, even more importantly, may have an opportunity to place spectacular bets against irrationality.

Donald Trump Should Not be the Next President.

We can't endorse the candidacy of Donald Trump for President of the United States.  Donald Trump is unfit for high-office.  He is an amoral man, an economic illiterate, an imbecile and proud of his anti-intellectualism and lazy understanding of the world.  The problem with Donald Trump is that he does not have a particular political philosophy in which he views the world.  Instead, the man makes everything about himself, self-promotion, personal aggrandizement, and other signals of insecurity.

Banning Muslims Means Less Terrorism? Yes.

Can anyone provide a justification for not banning Muslim immigrants?  We're not arguing all Muslims are terrorists.  We're simply saying that among terrorists, almost all of them are Muslims.  Heck, maybe all terrorists are Muslims.  Considering this, doesn't it make logical sense that banning Muslims from immigrating or visiting America means that there will be less terrorists?

Donald Trump is Right to Ban Muslim Immigrants

Donald Trump recently called for a complete ban on all Muslim immigrants and visitors to the United States.  This would be a wonderful policy that would improve the safety of the American people. 

We are at war with radical Islam, even if the current occupant of the White House refuses to accept this fact.  Followers/adherents of other religions are not part of a worldwide movement that advocates hatred against the Western world. 

Many people will say, “But this will exclude so many good people!”  So what?  There are plenty of other people in the world who can come to the United States who are a much lower risk to America.   Will we miss the Muslims?  Not really.  Point to some prominent Muslim inventors, scientists, computer scientists, engineers.  Guess what, there aren’t that many—none that I can think of!

 Further, the Muslim religion itself is not compatible with Western ideals.  There isn’t a good example of Muslims integrating themselves very well in any Western country.  Not only that, but Muslims have not been known to condemn acts of terrorism.  Even if most Muslims will not commit acts of terrorism, how come they don’t condemn the terrorists who act in the name of Islam?  So Donald Trump is absolutely correct to demand that we reduce Muslim immigration.  America does not need to be open to absolutely every failed culture on the planet.  We can, and should, set some high standards to come to America.  

Obama and Democrats condemn America with "climate change" talks.

Obama is in Paris to condemn the United States and its citizens for pursuing economic growth rather than bow down to the climate change hysteria.  People want to live their lives, raise their families, and make a living.  They are not interested in having a third world lifestyle to fight a mythical problem that politicians seem too fascinated by.  People want higher incomes, new jobs, new products and services.  Do they really want politicians to raise our taxes, ration our energy usage, and tell us what we should not do?  No.  Shut the hell up, politicians.  We are sick and tired of you lecturing us, bullying us, and telling us where we can live, what kind of cars we should drive, and how we are terrible people.  Instead, Americans are going to vote out the politicians, namely Democrats, who continue to stand against progress.

Obama: I’m Not Interested In ‘American Leadership, Or America Winning’

We have long held that Democrats hate America and have contempt for the country to which they have been elected.  Recently, Obama said: "What I’m not interested in doing is posing or pursuing some notion of ‘American leadership’ or ‘America winning."

WHY NOT?!

Why shouldn't America win? How come Obama hates America so much that he is unwilling to develop a strategy to defeat ISIS? Why doesn't he want to defeat such people? ISIS can be defeated militarily, but this requires that Obama actually develop a strategy that is oriented towards permanently defeating such people.

Democrat Party Supports Terrorism

In the United States, Democrats care more about the potential for future Syrian refugees voting for Democrats in the future than they do about the national security interests of the American people.  Americans demand, and deserve, to be protected from external threats.  We're not arguing every Syrian is a terrorist, but why would we take the risk of importing people from a volatile and dangerous region, especially when ISIS promised that they would infiltrate themselves among the refugees?  It certainly does not seem to be a smart strategy to allow any such people into our country.  Yet, Democrats are highly determined to bring Syrians into the country.  Well, it makes sense:  Democrats hate America.  It's just a fact.

Mark Zuckerberg and the Islamists

Mark Zuckerberg refuses to admit that the Islamic terrorists are at war with Western civilization. He calls them "a small minority of extremists" but refuses to consider their ideology at all. Even a small number of individuals who are committed to do us harm can create a lot of problems. 19 hijackers took down the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon. What we need to do is give up on the hashtags and pointless emojis and focus on who are enemies are and stop pretending that ignoring the problem will make it go away. Just say no to any more Muslims immigrating to Western countries. Build a wall.

54% of Los Angeles' residents speak a language other than English at home. Huge failure!

Diversity does not work.  Look around the world: anytime there are differences of culture within a given geographical area, you will find civil war, riots, discrimination, social tension, and other problems.  I am not talking about “diversity of race.”  I am talking culture.  One example of too much diversity is the fact that 54% of Los Angeles’s residents speak  a language other than English at home.  How can an American city exist as an American city when a majority of its residents speak some language other than English?  How does that work?  One example of this failure is anyone who has followed any news about the Los Angeles Unified School District.  LAUSD suffers from high dropout rates, poor academic standards, violent schools, an out of control bureaucracy, and other failures.  Part of this problem is the fact a large number of the students are illegal aliens and are literally have no stake in the American system whatsoever.  They don’t speak English at home (or perhaps outside the home!), and thus, there is no chance that they will ever achieve success in America.  America must stand for something.  People need to speak English, and the vast majority of Americans need to speak English at home.  We cannot be 100 tiny countries in one city.  Trust me, that won’t end well.  

Democrats will turn America into a Brutal North Korean Communist State

When you ask Democrats what the limits are to their agenda of using the government to fix 'problems,' both real and imagined, you get a blank stare.  That is because they actually do not know of any limit to their zeal to expand government's influence into every private sphere of our lives.  There is a reason why a lot of Democrats openly show admiration for the world's worst dictators, including Fidel Castro, the late Hugo Chavez, etc, etc.  Democrats wish that they had the same unlimited power that these despots have.

The Democrats running for president today are not going to tell you, dear voter, about how they want to increase the power of the government.  Government despots never talk about the power that they want for themselves.  Instead, they will talk about all of the "free crap" that they want to provide you, whether it is condoms, education, abortion, housing, or health care.  How do they provide you with this free shit?  Easy.  They have to steal the money from one group of taxpayers and hand out the goodies to the people voting for the politicians.  As time goes on, the producers start to wake up to what is going on and decide that perhaps they should work a lot less, thus reducing their taxable income.  The Democrats are at war against people who produce things for a living.   They don't provide anything new.  They are more like a mafia family that wears cheap suits and gives long, boring speeches with a fake smile.

Paul Ryan has an "F" score on Liberty Issues from Conservative Review

The media is trying to give us the impression that Paul Ryan is the last, best hope for Americans.  Well, sorry to say it, but it just isn't the case.  Paul Ryan has a score of "F" on liberty issues from Conservative Review.

It is entirely possible that Paul Ryan once believed in liberty.  However, he has been in office for far too long and his vision of the world has been influenced far too much by Washington and not objective reality.  This is another reason why there should be term-limits for Members of Congress.  Once people have been tempted by power, they have a tough time seeing reality as it exists and instead focus far too much on maintaining the power that they have. We reject the nomination of Paul Ryan for Speaker of the House.  We can do better.

Democrats have bankrupt America

America will soon have a new statutory debt limit of $19 trillion.  How can any party claim that they love America when they are destroying the country with so much debt that it literally will be impossible to pay it back?  Democrats are more than happy to continue borrowing more to pay off their worthless constituencies of radical voters who want other people to subsidize their lifestyle.  Democrats even think that their own voters are too stupid and incompetent to figure out how to have safe sex by buying a condom!  What does that say about them?  Can Democrat women figure out how to have sex without demanding that we go into more debt just so politicians can make more promises to offer free shit to constituents?

WHAT IS THE POINT OF HILLARY CLINTON'S CANDIDACY?

What is the actual point of Hillary Clinton's candidacy?  Is she particularly intelligent?  Not really.  What policy ideas does she have that the country desperately needs?  None.  She likes to remind us that she is a woman.  Okay....  She is not even a particularly principled leader of the left, having changed her view many times throughout her career.  I have only met one person who was excited about Hillary Clinton running for president, and she was not excited about Clinton's policy views at all.  Shouldn't we be focusing on someone who stands for our interests?  Hillary Clinton has received millions of charitable "donations" to her risible "non-profit," the Clinton Foundation, from foreign governments.  Why did they donate so much money?  What do they hope to gain from her candidacy?