Most LAUSD Students Headed for Prison; Prison Officials Want to Recruit More Students.

Most LAUSD Students Headed for Prison; Prison Officials Want to Recruit More Students.

The Los Angeles school system (known officially as the “Los Angeles Unified School District”) has a staff of college counselors to guide students to college. LAUSD school college counselors frequently invite college and university representatives from across the nation to meet with students. Currently, at any time of the year, students are likely to meet and greet with UCLA, USC, Pepperdine, and even Harvard representatives. Members of the U.S. military are also on hand on many occasions to speak to students about life in the military.

Not surprisingly, a state prison, feeling left out of post-graduate recruitment, has asked to be represented on campus, too. Representatives from San Quentin State Penitentiary, a maximum security facility, have asked to be admitted on campus to speak with students about life on its facilities, including its recreational activities, panoramic ocean front views of the Bay Area, eccentric inmates, friendly staff, and nutritious food.

Last fall, San Quentin’s Warden, Jack Anderson, had a private meeting with Los Angeles Unified School District Superintended Roy Romer. Jack Anderson specifically told Mr. Romer that the real truth is that most of the students attending Los Angeles schools will end up being sentenced to his facility for life anyway, and as a result, it would be appropriate for prison officials to be available to answer students questions, provide brochures of the historic facility, and even have field trips.

Mr. Romer appeared rather distraught by the conversation. The LA school superintended interrupted the prison official many times. Mr. Romer said, “Yes, yes, it is true: many of our students will be headed to prison after they graduate from high school. We have gangs and drug dealers. Kids kill each other on our facilities all the time—so it would not be such a radical change for them to live most of their life at San Quentin. However, I am concerned. If we were to invite you onto our campuses, it would suggest that we have a real problem on our hands and that we must fix it. And we do not feel there is any need to reform a school system as great as ours. Yes, most of our students cannot read but know how to pull a gun’s trigger, but the great salaries that our administrators receive in Downtown LA more than makes up for this educational deficiency.”

San Quentin’s Warden understood these concerns quite well. However, Jack Anderson said that the major reason for this recruitment effort is to find a place where most of these students will live once they graduate. “We all know that most of these kids are too stupid to be able to live in freedom and to be able to take care of themselves,” Jack Anderson said. To which Roy Romer responded, “Yes, they are awfully stupid, but if we could convince our brainwashed electorate to cough up another $100 billion to improve our public schools, I am sure that we could get some results.”

Phil Angelides: Tax Raiser

• California Gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides is distinctively anti-Objectivist. Phil Angelides holds the belief that high-income taxpayers in California can be punished and punished and, due to California’s great climate, eccentric population, and remarkable culture, would never leave. Phil Angelides does not believe that individuals who go to graduate (or professional school), spend a great deal of hours gaining experience, and who truly work hard and “play by the rules” (to use a Democratic slogan) should reap the benefits in this state.

• Phil Angelides wants to punish the productive class. Phil Angelidehas promised that his first act as governor would be to punish the individuals who work the hardest, pay the highest share of taxes, and who generate billions in state economic activity. This philosophy indicates that he wants to re-radically re-establish our system of punishment and rewards. Thus, if an individual starts a business, that person must be punished the moment that they become “wealthy” (according to the definition of the elite politicians.).
• Phil Angelides is a closet socialist. Phil Angelides, like many Soviet Union-era politician, holds the belief that government agents ought to control the population by controlling the economic activity of the state. This is exactly what Mr. Angelides wants to do: he wants to raise taxes so that the government, not the private sector, will have more funds. Further, Mr. Angelides wants to channel this money towards the parasitic class. In this particular election, the parasitic class’ pet project is “universal pre-school”—which already exists! (There is a federal program called “Head Start”—which is means tested to ensure that only the rift-raft class is eligible).
  
• Mr. Angelides is a good deal for the parasites, but not for the productive. The same politician who wants to punish the hard working wants to reward the worthless class of parasites. For instance, Phil Angelides believes that the parasites, the rift-raft population, the illegal alien, the gangsters who terrorize our government-run schools, the child rapists, and the unproductive welfare queens should be rewarded. In this present election, Phil Angelides wants to impose an additional 1% income tax on individuals earning more than $400,000 ($800,000, for those lucky enough to be married; perhaps we could call this the ‘discrimination against those who are too ugly, sick, or are too gay to get married’) so that illegal aliens can send their ten kids to pre-school. In contrast, Mr. Angelides wants to lavish these groups of people with more subsidies—even though it will not cause them to be more productive or change their behavior. They will be just as worthless to the state of California as before, but the productive will be harmed.
  
• California’s high income tax rate has chased away the very rich people that Mr. Angelides wants to tax! Venus Williams and Tiger Woods are the most notable high income earners who have left California for state income tax-free Florida. Apparently they were not convinced that they should “sacrifice” their income for the benefit of the parasite class. Income tax rates do affect human behavior. Mr. Angelides is either naïve or stupid if he believes that he can raise tax rates and increase tax revenue. More than likely, the higher tax rates will be a tax loser as the productive class leaves, leaving the middle class on the hook to pay for the voracious appetite of the parasite class. Is there any surprise that Bill Gates lives in state income-tax free Washington state?

The Democrats have shown no interest in opening up the United States to immigrants the country needs.

The Democrats have shown no interest in opening up the United States to immigrants the country needs. The United States is a country that millions of people from around the world wants to enter. Thus, the United States is faced with the unique position of being able to choose which individuals from around the world we wish to admit.

Considering this fact, one would think that the United States would choose immigrants who would substantially improve our economy, political life, and culture. This would include accepting only immigrants who have a college education (or its equivalent), substantial life experience, speak fluent English, have advanced skills or knowledge that is in short supply (science and math), and have a strong desire to become Americanized. There is no shortage of uneducated and unskilled workers. Los Angeles has far too many. It is time that our politicians open up our nation to the skilled and highly educated individuals of Europe and Asia, and to say no to uneducated and unskilled illegals from South America.

California State Senate Endorses the Illegal Alien Boycott

The California State Senate has proven that they care more about the welfare of illegal aliens than those legally within the state and the nation. Instead, the California Senate is actively encouraging illegal aliens to do whatever it takes to hurt the welfare of the state. Now that is a wonderful thing for a politician to do: support the lawbreakers and spit on the law-abiding citizens (and ultimately the only ones permitted to vote).

The Democrats are becoming more unhinged and crazy. For more evidence of how much Democrats hate America, read this article. The Angry Left will do anything to destroy the nation. They are a sad bunch.

Democrats Hate America

This is a hello to the people at Google :).

Another new immigration proposal: I would support a federal law that stated that illegal aliens are not entitled to state-supported attorneys in their criminal trials. I do not think that it is worth my taxpayer money to help defend illegal aliens from criminal prosecution. They have already shown that they have a propensity to commit crimes; they have never been subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and their continued presence is unlawful. As a result, I would be quite content with trying illegal aliens without their ability to have an attorney. Further, I would not support any effort to transcribe the court trial in their own native language.

Islam does not deserve respect. Death to Islam.

We know where the enemies of Western society reside. They are the madmen protesting in the streets throughout the world demanding the supremacy of Islam. These people are dangerous. If these host governments (such as Denmark) do not stop these individuals, then it is the responsibility of the United States to target and kill these vicious Islamicfascists--wherever they reside. Everytime I see pictures of these Muslims on the street, demanding that our governments begin censoring our newspapers, the only reaction I have is, this is not a debatable point, and "it is quite clear that Islam and the West cannot co-exist, so Islam itself must be destroyed." So let's begin the Crusades. Israel should expel the Palestinians by force or round them up and destroy them. Any group of people that elect a terrorist government has declared war, and it would be reasonable for Israel to target the Palestinians, drawing their guns at them, and killing them if the Arabic countries of Jordan and Saudi Arabia refuse to accept these so-called "refugees."

Yes, I believe that we are in the midst of World War III. It started with the publication of a cartoon making fun of the child molester/child rapist Muhammad (who has a hobby of enganging in terrorism), but it must end with the bombing and complete destruction of the Islamic people, their backward culture, cultish religion, and the barbaric men. Islam must die. Islam is evil. It is wicked. There are no good secondary effects from Islam. Many good natured individuals in the West would like people like me to show restraint and show caution, and not say bad words about a "great religion" (although what created this greatness either never existed or is long gone). No, quite the contrary, this is a time period where we have to be honest and say that there are things that cause disorder and chaos. Islam, and its terrorist founder Muhammad, are responsible for creating almost as much chaos and human strife as Karl Marx when he wrote "The Communist Manifesto." Just as we now know that Marx was quite wrong, we will one day say, "whatever happened to that terrorist religion, Islam"? Just because Islam is a proported "religion" does not mean that it earns any more respect than atheists who support The Communist Manifesto. Both the Korean and the Communist Manifesto are responsible for the deaths and misery of millions. And just as communism was stopped, so will Islam.

National Security Agency Intercepts Phone Calls Between Osama bin Ladin and Howard Dean

National Security Agency Intercepts Phone Calls between Osama bin Ladin and DNC Chairman Howard Dean.
The National Security Agency intercepted long distance phone calls from Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean to an untraceable phone in Afghanistan.  The voice on the phone appeared to be Osama bin Ladin.  In the call, Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, pleaded with bin Ladin not to stage any attacks during the Democratic National Convention in 2008, saying that such an attack would help the Republicans win the White House—again.  “I plead with you, bin Ladin, if you are going to stage an attack, please do so when it will have the maximum possible damage to the Republicans, not us,” Howard Dean was heard saying on taped transcripts leaked to the national press corps.  
This was not the first time Democrats have justified attacks on innocent Americans.  After September 11, for instance, Michael Moore, intellectual scholar of the left in America, was overheard saying that the attack was absurd because, well, New York City voted for Gore.  (Mr. Moore was unable to grasp that terrorists hate Republicans and Democrats equally).
Later that day Howard Dean protested President Bush’s once secret NSA wire tap program, saying that these secret wire tap programs unjustifiably interfere with the rights of Americans to have well-informed discussions with terrorists such as Osama bin Ladin. “How can a decent citizen hope to be able to make contact with such individuals if the government is listening in?  This is big brother!  Plus, well, I am sure that there are some good citizens who have some good reasons for speaking with a terrorist.  I can’t think of one at the moment, though.  Yeahhhhh!”  
Meanwhile, President Bush’s advisors told him that releasing Howard Dean’s transcripts with Osama bin Ladin would be unwise since Democrats would scream foul and claim that this is an underground right-wing coup against the leader of the Democratic National Committee.  Bush accepted the advice of his counselor and decided not to release such transcripts.  “I’m sick of hearing the Democrats complain when I do the right thing.  I still have the ringing sound of Nancy Pelosi saying “tax cuts for the rich” every time I’m trying to fall asleep,” Bush said.  
(The following was satire).  

Democrats hate America

Democrats hate America.  

Despite America’s appetite for aggressive efforts to attack al Queda, Democrats have done nothing but stand in the way and demand additional rights and safeguards for terrorist detainees.  U.S. Senate Democrats have decided that their constituencies -- aging 1960s liberals, university professors, international celebrities – are in line with the terrorists.  Despite cries from across the country to get tough on terrorism, Democrats have sided with the terrorists’ interests.  
     Every time the terrorists attack American soldiers or innocent Iraq citizens in Iraq, you can count upon the Democrats to argue to “pull out” of Iraq (didn’t the Democrats learn anything in their sex-ed class: premature pull outs are not effective strategies!)  Certainly the Democrats, especially the professoriate class, are able to understand that there must be some inherent reason that the terrorists have headed to Iraq.  Would reason could that be?  Surely the terrorists did not enter Iraq with the intent of creating a peaceful country that will be allies with the world community.  
     Even if the Democrats do not support the war against Saddam Hussein, perhaps because they believe that Mr. Hussein was an honorable statesman in the mold of George Washington, they should not continue to disparage the war effort.   For one thing, the terrorists continue to attack the troops, not because they intend to win on the battlefield, but rather because they hope that this will cause the Democrats to speak more loudly against the war, hoping for a withdrawal.  This is not in the national interests of the United States.  If we did withdraw prematurely, the terrorists would not only take over Iraq and establish a terrorist state, but terrorists would continue to strike against America’s interests in the hopes that wimp Democrats would support a withdrawal. Democrats who continue to speak out against the war, hoping for a withdrawal, obviously hate America and have sided with our terrorist enemies.  
     Democrats have to realize that they are weak on national security and should focus on their strengths—whatever that may be.  National polls taken over the last few decades have shown that the public has consistently given Democrats poor marks for their stance on national security issues.  It is therefore quite surprising that Democrats have chosen to continue to focus on this issue.   In life, one must narrow one’s focus towards those things that they are able to accomplish.  Democrats have never won a national election based upon their stanches on national security.  Isn’t it time that the Democrats withdraw from this particular issue?  
     The constituency within the Democratic Party that cares about national security positively scares the public.    When the public at large sees protests from Democratic activists groups—such as A.N.S.W.E.R. (an international, extreme, left-wing anti-war group that has never condemned a dictatorship in its entire existence)—the public becomes fearful.  The public rightly things that such individuals would not be proper representatives of the public at large. Even more unfortunate is that the Democrats have to be accountable to these irresponsible individuals.  The main reason that formerly “mainstream” Democrats have to listen to these malcontents is because the malcontents, lead by party chairman Howard Dean, actually represent the base of the party.  And the base of the Democratic Party clearly hates America, resents our standard of living, and wishes to send the United States back to a period of time where we were a third-world nation.  Unfortunate, but true.  Therefore, the public can only protect America by opposing the Democratic Party, which clearly hates America.

Damn Illegal Alien Mexicans

You know the more I hear about the results of immigration, the more I actually personally loathe and have bitter hatred for the illegal immigrants who cross the border. Okay, I'll admit it: I am a hateful person. I don't like what they are doing to our society and I resent is quite strongly. For instance, I have talked about this many times, but the destruction of the Ambassador Hotel is the last straw. It appears as though those evildoers at the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) actually knew that most of the students who will go to school on the site of the former Ambassador Hotel are illegal immigrants."Officials were planning to replace the long-shuttered grande dame of Wilshire Boulevard with a school big enough for 4,000 students, many of them immigrants and minorities, who would otherwise have to keep riding buses across town." So the fuck cares if they have to go ride on a bus across town. We are going to destroy a national monument just so a bunch of illegal alien Mexican gang members can go to a local school? FUCK THEM!!! DAMN I AM ANGRY TODAY!!!

Parasitic Personality Disorder

Parasitic personality disorder: although I am not a psychologist, I am creating a new disorder. Parasitic personality disorder refers to individuals employed by the government who depend upon the government for their entire subsistance, would not have the capablility of working for a private employer, who hold an entitlement view of their job ("this is my job for life regardless of how well I do"), and have an unhealthy interest in politics, especially on pushing for tax hikes to steal money from the productive sector of the economy to fund the parasites--the government school teachers, government-run hospital workers, government-run postal workers, governmental bureacrats.

Individuals classified as having parasitic personality disorder are very selfish, but they are quite successful in portraying themselves as being in favor of the public interest, which is quite contrary to fact and wisdom. Governmental-school teachers, for instance, are parasites because their principal reason for being a teacher (in the vast majority of circumstances) is based on a desire of having a fairly easy job for life. Not having to worry about being fired, they do not have to try at all. Some teachers sleep in class. Hey, why wake me up when I can get paid to sleep in class? Yet the class of individuals with parasitic personality disorder only seems to grow.

Parasitic personality disordered individuals have been able to con the vast majority of voters in California into feeling sympathy for them. This is unhealthy. In America, voters should never have any more sympathy toward its "workers"--the looting governmental workers who steal our money--than it should towards its own employees. Suffice it to say, an employer would never bankrupt itself in an effort to "sympathize" with its workers. But this is exactly what is happening here in California: with all of the governors' proposals failing in the polls, the only lessen to learn is that the government has done a masterful job in brainwashing the citizenry into voting against society's best interests. Normal, average workers should say, "I have not been offered a job for life, why the hell should these lazy governmental workers be offered a job for life?" No, instead people weep and feel sorry for the lousy governmental school teachers. Well, I don't. I say it's time to be more aggressive and tell the truth about these lousy workers -- and that we shouldn't only "reform" the system by making it easier to hire good teachers and fire bad ones, but that we ought to privatize in total the entire school system. That is the only cure to parasitic personality disorder.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has not done enough to cure individuals with parasitic personality disorder. He ought to fire all of these governmental workers: this is the only cure. Faced with the realization of how life actually works -- for instance, that one does not usually obtain a job by creating a mob scene in the street while screaming epithets at high-ranking governmental officials, perhaps these parasites may actually learn how to be productive to society. Until that time, parasitic personality disorder will continue to be an expensive deadweight in America.

America Should Torture Sub-Human Islamic Terrorists

There is a lot of talk in Washington about codifying certain rules against torturing Islamic terrorists held in U.S. custody. It is strange that we are even hearing about this story. I do not think that most Americans take much time during their day to concern themselves with the U.S.' treatment of savage Islamic terrorists. Quite the contrary, I would say that it is natural, and even healthy, to wish these individuals harm. Life typically operates under the principal of treating others as one would like to be treated. Such a policy makes sense most of the time, but makes little, if any, sense with the terrorists: the terrorists would never reciprocate and honor such a policy. They consider such policies a signal of "weakness"--a signal that we cannot fight fire with fire. Further, when we torture terrorists, it is not because they are infidels and sub-human savage Islamic fundamentalists, but rather because torturing these wicked beasts may lead to intelligence data that can be immediately used to fight terrorists around the world. Torturing Islamic terrorists would not place U.S. servicemen and women in harms way because we are highly unlikely to ever attack a civilized nation that agrees with the Geneva Convention. The U.S. only goes to war against savage beasts. These savages should be tortured in the most painful method possible to extract information from them. We should also publicize such video to areas of the world where terrorist savages congregate (essentially where the Muslims reside)--as a signal of deterence. Further, we ought to state that we will no longer support these terrorists' religious practices. Their Koran ought to be confiscated and instead they should be given Bibles. You don't see any Christian terrorists, do you? Secondly, they will be fed pork, and if they do not eat it, they will be force-fed. If we in the West continue to proclaim the false lie that these terrorists are not true "Muslims," then we should provide these individuals with Muslim-friendly meals, or carpets, or Korans, or show them where Mecca is.

Illegal Immigration

If there's one thing that makes me angry lately, it is the rapid rise in wanton foreign invading Mexican illegal aliens. As the number of illegal aliens rises, I predict that there will be a rise in racism against Mexicans, perhaps properly so, especially since the population will believe that such individuals do not respect the sovereingty of the United States and are thus less trustworthy in other civil and criminal matters.

• The illegal alien problem is pressing and urgent: Los Angeles schools are overcrowding to the max; Mexican gang members are engagnging in domestic terrorism everyday, and we're doing nothing to deport such individuals.
• We need to send the Mexican illegal aliens back because their cultural attributes are not Western and they do not hold our values. Mexican majority cities are dirty, do not maintain the same standards as other cities do, and their school systems are dysfunctional.

• Further, as Mexican illegal aliens become a larger part of the population, corporations will not hold to the same high standards as they once did since they will actually cater to the tastes and wishes of Mexican illegal alien nationals -- people with whom do not hold to the same high standards that assimiliated Westerners do. It has taken a long time to develop certain Western values in the United States.

• We cannot continue as a great nation if the individuals coming across the border each day illegally subscribe to inferior third-world nation's values, which Mexico certainly is. Since corporations follow consumer preferences, corporate standards will only remain high so long as its customers maintain high standards. Mexican nationals are used to a lower level for quality and standards for products and services. These lowered expectations could effect corporate behavior to the detriment of U.S. citizens.This is a time period when draconian laws are necessary to protect the national security of the United States.

1. Some civil liberties of illegal aliens may have to be curtailed. I would support banning Mexican civil rights organizations from enganging in any political action since such organizations are likely facilitators of treason against the United States.

• We should prohibit the sale or purchase or Spanish language newspapers,
• ban licenses for Spanish-language television or radio programming.-
• We should build the wall around the United States and Mexico as high as possible with barbed wire and the national army ready to shoot any invaders.-
• We should impose taxes on these wire transactions to Mexico at a rate of 45% to 60% at all banks, wire transfer facilities, bank cashing facilities. This would reduce the amount of money that is sent back to Mexico that props up that corrupt country.-
• Employers ought to be fined $50,000 per day, per illegal alien worker, along with all profits derived from hiring an illegal alien over an American citizen, permanent resident, or other valid visa.
• - Illegal aliens should not be provided any healthcare (even if they are able to pay), education, or any other welfare benefit.- All property owned by an illegal alien shall be transferred, without compensation, to the Department of Homeland Security.--
• Further, we need to counter the immigration from Mexico with immigrants from nations that do subscribe to our values. As a result, I, as a future Congressman, would allow for an unlimited number of immigrants (and provide them with very rapid citizenship) from the following nations: Sweden, Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Finland, Switzerland, England (Muslims will be excluded), New Zealand, and Japan.

We Urge the Senate to Reject Miers

We have been dissapointed with Bush's decision to nominate unqualified political hack Harriet Miers. We urge the Senate, including our foes the Democrats, to oppose this nominee.

There is no evidence at all that Miers has ever seriously thought about important constitutional issues prior to this nomination. We're tired of lame-brain Justices such as Souter and Stevens and Kenned. We won this election--it is time we Republicans nominated someone who will vigorously argue the constitutional theory of originalism. For these reasons, we urge the Senate to reject the nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats Support 100% Tax Rate

Washington – Democratic Members of the House of Representatives announced today a new tax plan, creating a new marginal tax bracket of 100% for all taxpayers. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced the plan with a smile, saying, “While President Bush’s tax cut plan goes to the rich, this plan will help the average American family since all their money will go to Washington, D.C. and we will have an opportunity to expand social welfare programs to benefit them.”

Many conservatives have criticized the plan, calling it similar to communism. House Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) called it a “power grab by a few socialists in the House.” Rep. Henry Waxman angrily responded: “If we don’t impose this new tax of 100% on every American’s income, we will never be able to provide seniors a prescription drug benefit, Social Security modernization, and affordable daycare.”

Some Americans have looked at the plan with skepticism, but Democrats said that most Americans do not understand the plan yet. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said that “this plan is a bit more complicated and it is premature to criticize the plan.” He also added: “I am troubled by the amount of criticism this plan has received.”

University professors have been some of the most avid supporters of the tax plan. Robert Smith, Ph.D., a professor of political science at an east coast Ivy League school recently told a class that this “100% tax rate will help bring about a more cooperative, less hierarchical and better managed livelihood of our economic sphere.” Most students sat quietly and took notes.

When asked why he keeps most of his money abroad in tax-sheltered accounts, Smith defended this practice by saying that he was conducting important research and could not be bothered, as everyone else will under the plan, of having to lobby Congress to get a stipend for personal usage. “My research,” Smith later said, “has to do with Marxist philosophers who live in clubs sipping champagne in France, which is vitally important.”