Has World War III Begun?

Mark Levin famously asserted that World War III has begun.  We happen to agree with this view.  Of course, fighting the Islamofascist enemy, which is an ideology, will be different from the way wars have been fought against the axis powers.  However, we have to admit that militant, theocratic-Islam is a worldwide movement, is very ideological, and appears to be a war that is infecting every part of the planet.  Most of the leaders in the West do not seem able to handle this war very well.  A lot of leaders, including President Obama, do not even wish to identify the enemy.  (How can you win a war when you refuse to name your enemy?  Answer: you can't).  This war is likely to last a long time.  Most citizens in Western nations don't even realize what is going on because most leaders refuse to identify the enemy (Islamofascism).   Well, I believe that over the long-run, eventually a leader steps up and addresses a problem.  The right person will indeed show up.

Obama Hates America

One out of three Americans do not believe Obama loves America.  Can someone list a single thing in Obama's background that would suggest that he loves America--the way it was founded?  We are living in a post-constitutional America, where the rule law no longer applies.  The reason why people come from all over the world to enter into America is because we are a land of freedom and liberty.  People did not come here because they want freebies, politicians who think they can do whatever they want, or because they think "Obama is cool."  The people who legitimately immigrate to America do so because our nation is different from the places where they came from.  If you're reading this from China or some other place where the rule of law applies, you know that this is true.
The legitimate question to ask is how did we reach a point in time that we would elect a man who has contempt for America to be our nation's president?  That is the part that does not make sense.  Obama is not an ordinary president with typical ambitions.  Rather, he seeks to control this country in any way that he can.

Jordan Shows how to Defeat the Islamists

The King of Jordan, Abdullah, who is a direct descent of Muhammad, showed how to defeat the Islamic radicals.  Abdullah has taken the fight to the enemy, delegitimized the Islamic ISIS cockroaches, and he made a wonderful video showing the righteousness of defeating the enemy.  The King of Jordan made a number of wonderful decisions to harm the ISIS cockroaches:

1. King Abdullah promised that he would execute ISIS terrorists if his Jordanian pilot was killed. He followed through with his promise.  Major points to you, Abdullah!  
2. He ordered a massive air campaign against ISIS, killing 55 of the bastards.  Now that is how you win.  You get rid of the enemy.  You don't debate them.  If you are dealing with bloodthirsty bandits, you have to get rid of them on the battlefield.  
3. He did not appease or give in to the ISIS bastard terrorists.  Not an inch. 

It is obvious that King Abdullah cares a great deal about winning the war against Islamic radicals.  Too bad our current president could not care less about this fight.  

President Obama Attacks Christians while ISIS Rages on with Barbarity.

We couldn't believe it when we read the news.  Despite the disgusting barbarity of ISIS, Obama has chosen to attack Christians for acts taken nearly 1,000 years ago.  You have to literally be kidding!    What does ISIS have to do with modern Christian barbarity?  Absolutely nothing.   This is just another signal that Obama does not intend to do anything with regard to Islamic terrorism.  The world is literally becoming more dangerous, but the government that is supposed to protect us is not going to do so, unfortunately.

Why do we assume the government should run airline security?

Why do we assume that government has the answers in terms of best safety practices for airlines? The airplanes passengers fly on are the property of the airlines. Each airline should be free to determine whatever security practices it believes is appropriate for the safety of the airline and the passengers. Airlines have every incentive to focus on protecting the airplane: not only is an airplane expensive to replace, but also, the loss of good will from an incident could easily put the airline out of business. Secondly, by having a diverse number of security practices, it would create a lot more unique solutions to securing the airline. Thirdly, airlines would never impose policies that would result in passengers being harassed. I highly doubt airlines would, if they could, pat down elderly grandmothers, children in wheelchairs, and toddlers, but the government does so, because government is about force, not wisdom.